The Military High Court of the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) concluded hearings on September 22, 2026, in Kinshasa in the case involving Lieutenant-General Philémon Yav Irung, who is facing charges including treason and involvement in activities aimed at challenging the authorities.
In its closing submissions, the Military Prosecutor’s Office rejected several arguments raised by the defense, particularly those concerning the treatment of co-defendant Shauri Chibogo Issa, the evidentiary value of statements attributed to him, and the interpretation of Article 182 of the DRC Penal Code.
The prosecution maintained that evidence and information gathered during the investigation support the charges and requests it has presented before the court.
The defense lawyers representing Philémon Yav disputed the prosecution’s position, arguing that the evidence relied upon by the prosecution lacked sufficient legal and factual basis.
They also challenged the prosecution’s interpretation of Article 18 of the DRC Constitution, arguing that its provisions had been misrepresented.
After hearing arguments from both sides, the Military High Court closed the hearings and entered the deliberation phase.
The judges will now examine the case file, the evidence presented, and the arguments made by both the prosecution and the defense before issuing their ruling.
The court said its decision would be delivered within the timeframe provided for under Congolese law.
As of now, no final judgment has been issued concerning the charges against Philémon Yav.
The requests made by the prosecution do not, in themselves, mean that the accused has been found guilty. The final determination rests with the court.
Rwandatribune.rw
